future
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| future [2020/02/18 16:24] – jtwine | future [2020/02/23 00:11] (current) – jtwine | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| + | '' | ||
| ===== Additional Semantic Checks ===== | ===== Additional Semantic Checks ===== | ||
| Line 64: | Line 65: | ||
| Maybe one day... | Maybe one day... | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Method Call Syntax ===== | ||
| + | One of the things I have been kicking around is the possibility of making 10LC look more like //method calls// in a language like C/ | ||
| + | <code c> | ||
| + | Write @ 0x1000 = 1234; | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | But would it be better or more appealing if the statement was written like: | ||
| + | <code c> | ||
| + | Write( 0x1000, 1234 ); | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | Or maybe that would only be preferable to actual software developers/ | ||
| + | |||
future.1582043070.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/02/18 16:24 by jtwine
