User Tools

Site Tools


future

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
future [2020/02/18 10:24] jtwinefuture [2020/02/22 18:11] (current) jtwine
Line 28: Line 28:
 </code> </code>
  
 +''Note'': this has been implemented via the ''[[documentation|WriteEx]]'' statement.
  
 ===== Additional Semantic Checks ===== ===== Additional Semantic Checks =====
Line 64: Line 65:
  
 Maybe one day... Maybe one day...
 +
 +===== Method Call Syntax =====
 +One of the things I have been kicking around is the possibility of making 10LC look more like //method calls// in a language like C/C++/C#/Java/etc. instead of just like text script.  An example of the ''Write'' statement is:
 +<code c>
 +Write @ 0x1000 = 1234;
 +</code>
 +But would it be better or more appealing if the statement was written like:
 +<code c>
 +Write( 0x1000, 1234 );
 +</code>
 +Or maybe that would only be preferable to actual software developers/programmers and not those used to just script?
 +
future.1582043070.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/02/18 10:24 by jtwine